Illinois is set to re-wild the Prairie State, but will they?
https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/PublicActs/View/104-0062
A recently signed law gives the Department of Natural Resources the authority to re-establish wildlife in Illinois, specifically apex animals.
Illinois had a bear in its north west this summer. Bears are expanding in Wisconsin, Missouri, and Kentucky and that all makes Illinois a candidate to take up new populations. Unlike Iowa, the bear is already a protect animal in Illinois so wanderers have a puncher's chance to establish a new home range in relative peace. Southern Illinois and the Mississippi River bluff lands seem like the obvious places for new territories.
The farm lobby and most sporting groups were opposed to the measure. The specter of lions, wolves, or bison damaging crops, stock and property were the most cited reasons.
Bears or lions returning slowly and on their own costs the state nothing. Reintroducing costs a lot of money, and I'm not aware of how "flush" their state budget is.
I don't see the possibility of elk or bison coexisting with row crops, fences, or all the miles of roadway in Illinois. The similarity to Iowa is tight. It's my opinion that the cooperation and trust of the public that live in likely "rewild" areas will cost a lot more than the dollars to release and manage apex animals. Trust in our government is fundamental in a democracy, it transcends agreement or disagreement on given issues.
This law is exciting. It will stimulate a lot of dreaming and probably a good amount of nightmares to boot. The IL-DNR now has the power, will they choose to wield it?